De nieuwe grote kruistocht

[Pilgrim]

A New Crusade Must Be Declared Against Islam, And Christendom Must Rise Again To Have The Cross Crush The Crescent

By Ted on April 20, 2015 in Featured, General

By Theodore Shoebat

A new crusade must be declared against Islam, and Christendom must arise to stab to death the crescent with the sword of the Holy Cross. I did an entire video on this:

[Zie video op de site.]

The New Crusade will not be some secular war, but a Holy War. God did not choose certain nations for no reason. The lands of Christendom are divinely destined by Heaven to fight and destroy the armies of the Antichrist, and illuminate the world with the Holy Faith.

God and the devil are in a cosmic war — almost like a chess match — and their means to victory are nations. Some nations belong to God and others belong to Satan. Some are pawns, some are bishops, some kings and queens, some are stronger than others. But they all have their purpose and functions, and they all are instruments toward one goal: victory. There are many nations in Christendom, some are strong and others are stronger, but they will all work together for the glory of the Cross.

The lands of Russia and the United States, Italy and France, and Spain, all are nations that have been used by God as weapons for the establishment of justice over injustice.

It was to Spain where St. Paul and St. Peter sent seven preachers to bring the true Faith to the Spaniards; it was in France where Mary Magdalene walked; it was in Italy where the blood of the blessed Apostles, Peter and Paul, touched the divinely created earth. All of these lands are consecrated by the presence of saints, and from this is their destiny established, not for evil, but for the destruction of evil.

The lands where Christendom once was are now declined, morally and spiritually, but it is growing, and its beautiful flowers are blooming in Russia. The Christian Roman Empire is reviving and continuing, not in Rome or Greece, but in Russia.

In the year 2012, one of the top clerics of the Russian Orthodox Church, Vsevolod Chaplin, said that in ten years Russia will change the world for the better, not in any secular way, but by being the means by which the nations would be illuminated and transcended through Christianity. Chaplin said:

Our Orthodox civilization may not be that large, but today it has a key role in the world as it knows how to find a way to a better life for the whole world and especially Europe

Russia, according to Chaplin, will be modeled after the most holy emperors, Constantine and Justinian, two great sovereigns who crushed paganism for the advancement of the Holy Faith.

Surely, Constantine, regardless of all the slanderers who venomously sully him, was a great Christian emperor, one who fought for the Faith, and strived with unresting hands to combat the enemies of holy truth. He labored, with the temporal sword of the Church, to purge the empire of sickening practices.

He saw how in Phoenicia they forced women to be temple prostitutes, how their poor children had no knowledge of who their father was, and how homosexuals partook in devil worship. Scorning such evil, Constantine hastened to abolish this practice, and he had churches built over the place where these demonic orgies were done, and ordered that a bishop and a sacred clergy be put over them. He saw with contempt the diabolical temple of Venus at Aphaca, on Mount Libanus in Phoenicia, where homosexual rites were done, and orgies were performed. In the words of Eusebius,

“Here men underserving of the name forgot the dignity of their sex, and propitiated the demon by their effeminate conduct. Here too unlawful commerce of women and adulterous intercourse, with other horrible infamous practices, were perpetuated in this temple as in a place beyond the scope and restraint of law.” (Eusebius, Life of Constantine, 3.40)

Did Constantine tolerate such a place? Did he say, “live and let live” and went on with it? Did he say the usual opinion of, “well as along as they’re not hurting anyone, I don’t care”? Absolutely not. He was a defender of Christendom, not a impotent governor who allows his country to decay through indifferentism. He had the entire building demolished, and the depraved rituals observed within it outlawed. (Eusebius, Life of Constantine, 3.40; Socrates, 1.18)

In Cilicia there was a famous temple which was believed to house a demon that was worshipped as a holder of healing powers, and it was said that the demon would manifest itself to people while they stayed inside in the evening time. Constantine did not see their belief as within some vague notion of religious freedom, but instead he ordered that the entire temple of Satan be burned to the ground, (Socrates, 1.18; Eusebius, Life of Constantine, 3.45) and the order was swiftly fulfilled, as Eusebius explains:

“For since it happened that many of these pretenders to wisdom were deluded votaries of the demon worshipped in Cilicia, whom thousands regarded with reverence as the possessor of saving and healing power, who sometimes appeared to those who passed the night in his temple, sometimes restored the diseased to health (though in reality he was a destroyer of souls, who drew his easily deluded worshippers from the true Savior to involve them in impious error), the emperor, consistently with his practice and desire to advance the worship of Him who is at once a jealous God and the true Savior, gave directions that this temple also should be razed to the ground. In prompt obedience to his command, a band of soldiers laid this building, the object of admiration even to noble philosophers, prostrate in the dust, rather a deceiver of souls, who had seduced mankind for so long a series of years.” (Eusebius, Life of Constantine, 3.45)

The nations of Christendom will soon restore themselves back under the refuge of the Holy Cross, the Holy Roman Empire will rise again through divinely destined Russia, and the Holy Cross will crush the crescent.



http://shoebat.com/2015/04/20/a-new-cru ... -crescent/

[mercator]

The nations of Christendom will soon restore themselves back under the refuge of the Holy Cross, the Holy Roman Empire will rise again through divinely destined Russia, and the Holy Cross will crush the crescent.

Goed dat in Orthodox Rusland zulke fantasieën leven, k hoop dat het werkelijkheid wordt. Maar ik heb zo mijn twijfels. Het kan ook een stuk eenvoudiger en dan hoeven we God niet wakker te maken: het Plan Mercator uitvoeren.

[sjun]

Geen onaardig teken om halve maan en roos onder te bestrijden. Bovendien aardig om bij de kinderen op te brengen die vanuit school of buurthuis naar de moskee worden gedirigeerd.

[mercator]

Geen onaardig teken om halve maan en roos onder te bestrijden.

Nu pas snap ik dat je geen aandoening van de hoofdhuid bedoelt maar de rode roos van het socialisme. Het is idd urgenter om die ideologie met wortel en tak uit te roeien dan de Islam zelf. Islam/moslims zijn niks, kunnen niks. Dat ze zo succesvol zijn kunnen worden is 100 % de schuld van het Marxisme en zijn afvalproducten socialisme en communisme.

[Pilgrim]

Are We Witnessing the Start of a New Crusade?

Fr. Dwight Longenecker | Nov. 21, 2015

Pope Francis has described the present turmoil across the globe as “a world war fought piecemeal.” With the current world reaction to jihadist atrocities do we see a piecemeal world war, or are we witnessing the rise of the twenty first century wars of religion?

In other words, Are we engaged on a new crusade?

Secularists rush to deny the religious aspect of the conflict with jihadists. Whenever possible they talk about “extremists” or “terrorists” and try to avoid the obvious conclusion that the Islamic terrorists are motivated by their religion. Likewise, when the victims are clearly Christian, and have been targeted for torture and death because of their faith in Christ the secular news media will spin the story and relegate the horrors to “ethnic conflict” or “tribal wars.”

The fact of the matter is that Islamic terrorists are targeting Christians in specific attacks. Furthermore, we may not regard the countries of Western Europe and North America as particularly “Christian” countries, but the Islamic terrorists of ISIS do. They speak enthusiastically about the coming war with “Rome”, which is their shorthand for what they perceive as the Christian powers of the West.

When France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States wade into battle we may imagine that we are simply defending ourselves from a terrorist threat. We may deny that we are fighting a war of religion, but I believe we are—even if we are denying it. We may not wheel out priests and pastors to bless the bombs, and the pope may not go out on the balcony and call all good Catholics to take up arms in a holy war, but when we attack terrorists who are driven by their religion, then we are also attacking their belief system. If we are not engaged in an explicit holy war, we are certainly waging a battle between our belief system and theirs—and what is that but a war of religion?

G.K. Chesterton said, “Every argument is a theological argument.” He meant that beneath and behind every human conflict is a conflict of belief. We argue and eventually go to war not only because the other side has more wealth and power and we want it. That motivates warriors up to a certain point, but what really motivates warriors on both sides is the belief that their cause is not only right and just, but it is God’s cause. When soldiers are marching out to war they do so with the most zeal when they believe themselves to be marching out with God on their side.

Whether God is anyone’s side in war can be debated, but most people would agree that the Nazi soldiers who thought God was on their side were wrong. Likewise, no matter what they think, we believe that God is not on the side of terrorists who behead children, blow up innocent bystanders, rape and enslave teenage girls and fly jets into skyscrapers. Instead we believe it might just be possible that God is on the side of warriors who avoid vengeance, use war as a last resort, fight in self defense, measure their response and execute their engagement with restraint and justice.

The war against terror is clearly necessary for the sake of self-defense and protection of peace and security. To defeat terrorists—whether they are Islamic, Marxist or Mafia gangsters—is necessary for the sake of justice. Whether it is also a war of religion, and the warriors of the West are fighting for the truth, beauty and goodness of Christ and his Church—in other words, whether we are witnessing the rise of a new crusade— is something to be debated.

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/longenec ... ew-crusade

Alleen jammer dat deze paus nooit zal oproepen tot een kruistocht, maar eerder het tegenovergestelde zal doen.

[xplosive]

 

"Kill Them All": Politician Calls for Holy War Against Islam

Posted on June 9, 2017 by Universal Life Church Monastery

In an impassioned Facebook post following the latest terror attack in London, a Louisiana congressman called for a Christian holy war against "Islamic horror."

Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA.) sees violence as the only viable solution for combating terrorism. Regarding how to treat Muslims who’ve been radicalized, he doesn’t mince words: "Hunt them, identify them, and kill them. Kill them all."

Attached to Rep. Higgins’ highly controversial language was a photo of a London police officer standing beside the body of one of the attackers. As is often the case these days, the post went viral and sparked a massive online debate.

Backlash

Within hours, the post had spawned thousands of reactions. While many of the congressman’s supporters defended his statement, he also received heavy criticism. Wrote one Facebook user:

"Wow, you are no better than a terrorist. I’m more afraid of people like you than a refugee who was vetted for 2 years by 7 Intel agencies. I think we need better vetting for our representatives. You are an unhinged lunatic and playing right into what ISIS wants."

The Louisiana Democratic Party also released a statement condemning the language:

"The congressman points to Christianity to justify his backward position. As a party that strives to put in place representatives who serve progressive, inclusive Louisiana values, we urge him to look to 2 Timothy 1:7, 'for God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline.' Rep. Higgins’ language is exactly the sort of response that terrorists aim to provoke."



"Cajun John Wayne"

Rep. Higgins is a former law enforcement officer who was elected in a December runoff election. Affectionately nicknamed the “Cajun John Wayne” by his supporters, Higgins has become incredibly popular for his frank way of speaking, unabashed Christian beliefs, and strong support for law and order policies.

But Higgins – who is known to carry a Bible and wear a gun to town hall meetings with constituents – has had his share of problems in the past. Shortly before running for office, he was forced to resign from his law enforcement position after referring to suspects as "animals" and "heathens". The congressman has also been married 4 times, and is currently trying to pay off over $100,000 in back child support.

Are We Headed for Holy War?

There has been a marked uptick in violent terrorist attacks during Ramadan, the Muslim holy month. Recent attacks in London, especially, highlight the severity of the ongoing clash between Islamic extremism and Western values.

When faced with the brutality and inhumanity of such senseless violence, there is little wonder that people like Rep. Higgins find a home for their own extreme thoughts in the fearful hearts of so many.

Is there an avenue for peace moving forward? We’d like to think a holy war can be averted, but comments like those made by Rep. Higgins are far from encouraging.

[Pilgrim]

Poll: Support for another Crusade at highest level since 14th century

By SNAFU On Mar 24, 2016



VATICAN CITY — For the first time in seven centuries, support for a new Crusade topped all other economic, religious, and foreign policy concerns, according to yesterday’s Vatican/CNN survey of “self-identified” Christians in Europe and the United States.

Nearly 95 percent of respondents reported that they “strongly supported” the building of an army to place the entirety of modern day Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon under the banner of the Holy See. Those polled indicated that though they “sort of” enjoyed the basic tenets of democracy, the terror attacks in Belgium made them willing to cede all political and military power to the Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church, Pope Francis.

Though enthusiasm for a new Crusade is exceptionally high, some Vatican historians wonder whether those survey were a bit overzealous.

“We’ve tried this before and it didn’t go all that great in the grand scheme of things,” noted Cardinal Carlo Vigano. “If you don’t believe me, just Google the word ‘Saladin'.”

The poll also indicated that many Europeans would be willing to enlist in either the Knights Templar or the Order of the Holy Sepulchre, should the Vicar of Jesus Christ (Pope Francis) give his blessing for yet another Crusade. Belgian Alex Moreau noted that “rage and fine beer” would provide “ample sustenance” should he join a Christian Army tasked with burning a trail of his Almighty glory across any number of Muslim countries.

Even war-weary American citizens appear willing to personally back another military engagement in the region.

Chris Dunham, a 30-year-old consultant living in Boston, is no exception.

“So what, I haven’t been to Mass since I got married 5 years ago, but I’m still a Catholic. I will always fight for a good cause,” said Dunham, who failed to join any branch of the U.S. armed forces after 9/11, adding that: “Hell, I’ve already changed my Facebook profile picture to show the Belgian national colors.”

Though the poll did not survey individuals living in the Middle East, Duffel Blog correspondents spoke with residents to gauge their reactions.

“Another military intervention?” Iraqi shopkeeper Abu al-Mansour jokingly asked. “I can’t wait. Just don’t pussy foot around with all that counterinsurgency stuff this time. Those ISIS guys are real assholes.”

http://www.duffelblog.com/2016/03/poll- ... h-century/

[Pilgrim]

GOD IN EUROPA

Geplaatst op 16 december 2017



Het lijkt of er tegenwoordig steeds vaker over het christendom gesproken wordt. Twee weken geleden werd God door de Zweden gender-neutraal verklaard. Vorige week verklaarde de Paus dat het Onze Vader niet deugt. Deze week roept de nieuwe Poolse premier op tot een herkerstening van Europa. Staan deze uitspraken los van elkaar of zijn het even zo vele reacties op het dreigende rijzende water van de islamisering?

In de Bijbel wordt de mens door God geschapen, maar in Zweden is het andersom en wordt God naar de huidige heersende politiek correcte mode gemodelleerd. Deze bisschop Eva Brunne, die dit blijkbaar mag besluiten, is dom. Ten eerste heeft God geen geslacht. Ten tweede is God onkenbaar. Het wezen of de kracht die God is tot genderneutraliteit promoveren of degraderen, laat zich slechts verstaan als een spiegel van de menselijke conditie. Kortom, wij zijn getuige van een creatieproces, maar het is een misgeboorte, waarmee de LGBTI discussie stilzwijgend van een religieus randje wordt voorzien.

Vroeger werd er nog wel eens geroepen dat God een zwarte lesbienne is, maar daar hoor je niemand meer over – (menselijke) modes zijn vergankelijk. Het idee dat de mens God naar zijn politiek correcte evenbeeld kan scheppen, is bijzonder misplaatst. Het is op zich een leuke gedachtekronkel, maar de discussie is niet zo open als het lijkt. Want waarom worden Allah, Jahweh, Boeddha en de Hindoeïstische goden niet tegelijkertijd gender-neutraal verklaard? Als Jezus inmiddels een inter-seksueel is, hoe zit het dan met Mohammed? Zolang er enkel en alleen westerse waarden ter discussie staan, is er sprake van laf dhimmi-gedrag. Wij bieden U onze westerse waarden ter pacificatie van uw grof geweld. Wij knielen voor uw monopolistische waarheden, want wij trillen op onze knietjes. Dat is de boodschap van deze bisschopsmuts, die in Zweden voor een religieuze hoogwaardigheidsbekleder m/v wil doorgaan.

De Paus wil het gebed van Onze Vader veranderen. De zin “Leidt ons niet in verzoeking” zit deze felrode paus blijkbaar in de weg, want God is enkel goedheid en zal dus niemand in verzoeking leiden. Alweer iemand die weet wat God wil en kan en alweer een dubieus initiatief, want het zijn weer enkel de westerse waarden waaraan getornd wordt. Deze Korankusser, die het Vaticaan als een dependance van Mekka ziet en liever vluchtelingenpolitiek bedrijft dan zich met de gelovigen bezig te houden, wil toch nog graag iets westers verneuken en dat is het gebed geworden. Heeft hij de Koran al uit? Wat vond hij van de oproepen van Allah tot geweld tegen andersgelovigen? Moeten daarin niet eens wat uitspraken veranderd worden? Zou je je niet eens druk maken over het lot van christenen in de islamitische wereld? Of schepen we liever nog wat (islamitische) vluchtelingen in richting Europa? Paus Franciscus belichaamt de onheilige drie-eenheid van Links (bevrijdingstheologie), Islam en Grootkapitaal (Rothschild’s zijn bankiers van de bank van het Vaticaan).

De nieuwe Poolse premier Morawiecki wil Europa her-kerstenen. Dat klinkt in het Engels beter: rechristianize Europe. Wat je er verder ook van vindt, in elk geval geeft het blijk van actie en van patriottisme en niet van laf politiek correct dhimmi-gedrag. Of het gaat helpen, is een andere vraag. Het zou kunnen werken als er een breed begrip van christendom was waar Europeanen zich thuis bij voelen. Iets wat aansluit bij de westerse waarden en de Europese eigenheid en ruimte biedt aan eigenheid en verandering. Als er iets is waar de West-Europese kerk niet goed in was, dan was het dat laatste, om iets te betekenen voor mensen in de laat 20e eeuw. Anders waren de kerken niet leeggelopen. Ook zitten we niet te wachten op een stelletje geprivilegieerde zakkenvullers die ons wel even komen vertellen wat we moeten doen, om over de Mekkapaus en de Zweedse dhimmi-bisschop nog maar te zwijgen.

Het is jammer, het geloof zou zo mooi kunnen zijn en het zou mensen kunnen verbinden, juist nu dat zo hard nodig is. In elk geval ademt het initiatief van Morawiecki actiebereidheid. Gaan we op weg naar nieuwe kruistochten? Ik sta nog niet te popelen, maar ik zie liever een kruistocht dan een geïslamiseerd Europa en een toekomst als dhimmi. En als een kruistocht het antwoord is op de grootste fout van de 20e eeuw, namelijk het ongelimiteerd binnenhalen van miljoenen moslims en ze ongehinderd hun gang laten gaan met onze maatschappijen te ondermijnen, dan moet het maar.

Door: Petra de Geus (december 2017)

https://ejbron.wordpress.com/2017/12/16/god-in-europa/

De geschiedenis van de kruistochten is volgens mij nog niet ten einde. De grootste kruistocht moet nog komen!

[Pilgrim]

De paden op, de lanen in

Geplaatst op 11 juni 2018



Elsevier internet van vandaag:

“De Turkse president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is woedend op de beslissing van Oostenrijk om zeven omstreden moskeeën te sluiten en veertig radicale imams uit te wijzen. Erdoğan waarschuwt dat dit kan leiden tot ‘een nieuwe kruistocht’.”

Hij vraagt er om. Aan ons om het te starten. De kruistochten waren gericht tegen de barbaren in het Midden-Oosten. Er is alle reden om deze agressieve dictator een lesje te gaan leren. Er moet toch wel een charismatische volksmenner onder de West-Europeanen gevonden kunnen worden die het startsein voor de mars naar Turkije leidt?

En als we dan toch op weg gaan, lopen we door naar Iran om een ayatollah te verjagen.

Door: “M.A.L. Sion” ([email protected])

https://ejbron.wordpress.com/2018/06/11 ... -lanen-in/

[Mahalingam]

‘Ik doe een oproep aan de Oostenrijkse premier,’ zei Erdogan zondagavond op een verkiezingsbijeenkomst. ‘U bent nog jong en u heeft ervaring nodig. Uw gebrek aan ervaring en dit soort handelingen zullen u duur komen te staan.’ Dat meldt het Turkse dagblad Hürriyet.

https://www.elsevierweekblad.nl/buitenl ... en-622988/

[Pilgrim]

TCK Presents: "Welcome to the New Crusade..."
TradCatKnight - Gepubliceerd op 22 dec. 2013



TradCatKnight: HOME of the NEW Crusade
TradCatKnight - Gepubliceerd op 6 jan. 2015

[Pilgrim]

De laatste slag...

[Pilgrim]

March of the Templars (legenda em latim)
Blood Blade - Gepubliceerd op 22 dec. 2017

[Hans v d Mortel sr]

Geweld toepassen is des moslims.

Conform de instructies van de historische Arabische ongeletterde afgodendienaar en woestijnsadist Mohammed.

Aangezien moslims parasieten zijn op onze kenniseconomie en beschaving dienen zij verwijderd te worden uit de beschaving die zij minachten en verachten. Als men parasieten niet snel weet op te sporen en te elimineren is dat levensgevaarlijk voor het voortbestaan van het geestelijk gezonde leven op aarde.

Aangezien moslims zich superieur voelen en volgens hun geloofsovertuiging (Jehvoah's Getuigen zijn precies zo) willen overheersen, dient hun Nederlands paspoort ingenomen te worden.