pd7835 schreef:Danube schreef:
Nee, ik ook niet. Denk even door, je hebt de sleutel van voortschrijdend inzicht in handen. Misschien is er helemaal geen causale relatie tussen Jezus en al het geweld dat in Zijn naam is gepleegd.
Nu deze logica doortrekken naar Mohammed en er is waarlijk een kwartje gevallen.
Wel denk even door. Dat is nu net het verschil tussen de politieke ideologie islam en een religie. Bendeleider, roofmoordenaar, politieker Mohammed is de sleutel. Denk er eens goed over na.The biggest misunderstanding here is that Islam is simply a religion. If Islam were only a religion, it would not even exist today. And it would certainly not be feared. The story of Mohammed and the success of his mission is well known. The summary of it is in Islam’s growth curve:
Mohammed’s career had two stages, religious and political. As a religious leader he only converted about 150 Arabs into Muslims in his first 13 years in Mecca. When he went to Medina, he became a politician and a jihadist. Politics and jihad made Mohammed a success. When he died, every Arab was a Muslim. If he had stayed with religion, when he died there would have only be a few hundred Muslims and Islam would have collapsed. It was politics that made Mohammed a success and it was politics that made Islam a success for 1400 years.
Islam’s historical success has been due to jihad and Sharia law. Jihad overthrew Christian, Zoroastrian, Buddhist and Hindu governments and the Sharia was put into place. The inferior political position of Christians and all Kafirs under Islamic Sharia means their slow annihilation. Turkey, Middle East and Africa are but a few examples of this.
The secret of Islam is that the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed are primarily devoted to politics, not religion. The Kafir is a political class under Sharia rule and much of Islamic doctrine is about the Kafir. viewtopic.php?f=34&t=22169
Ach, je hoopt op voortschrijdend inzicht. Met een blinddoek om en de vingers stijf in de oren is dat natuurlijk lastig.