De Islamisering van India

Waarom slaan bepaalde moslims, waar dan ook, elkaar en anderen de hersens in? Hoort geweld en de drang tot overheersing en bekering bij de essentie van de islam?
Gebruikersavatar
Ariel
Berichten: 89675
Lid geworden op: wo apr 07, 2004 10:30 pm

Re: De Islamisering van India

Bericht door Ariel »

POCSO Act overrides personal law in case of minor Muslim girl's marriage, observes Karnataka HC

The Karnataka HC while issuing a judgement on a case against a man marrying and impregnating a minor Muslim girl, observed that POCSO Act supersedes personal law like Mohammedan Law.

The Karnataka HC recently observed that the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act supersedes personal law in the case of a Muslim minor girl’s marriage. This observation was made when rejecting an argument during the bail hearing of a man who had married a minor Muslim girl.

The court also stressed that the girl’s marriage upon attaining puberty (15 years of age) will not contravene the Prohibition Of Child Marriage Act, 2006.

Terming POCSO as a special act, the Bench of Justice Rajendra Badamikar observed that it overrides personal law (Mohammedan Law). According to Pocso, the age for being involved in sexual activities is 18 years.

CASE DETAILS

The accused in the case was booked under sections of the POCSO Act and the Prohibition of child marriage Act for marrying and impregnating a minor Muslim girl. The incident came to light when the victim visited a Primary Health Care Centre for a check-up. Upon examination, it was discovered that she was pregnant and was around 17 years old.

When it came to court, the accused’s counsel argued that attaining puberty was the consideration for marriage under Mohammaden Law. The counsel further argued that since the girl had attained puberty at 15, the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act was not applicable.

The court rejected this by stating that since POCSO is a special Act, it overrides personal law.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right,
but the heart of the fool to the left.
Mahalingam
Berichten: 52064
Lid geworden op: za feb 24, 2007 8:39 pm

Re: De Islamisering van India

Bericht door Mahalingam »


Why the Muslim Brotherhood is Becoming a Growing Threat in India


Ajmal Sohail, co-founder and co-president of Counter Narco-terrorism Alliance Germany and a national security and counter-terrorism analyst

Pro-India politicians, both in India and abroad, are becoming increasingly concerned about the activities and future goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in India. While the Muslim Brotherhood is an internationally-recognized “non-violent” Islamist group, it does have indirect links to armed groups and wishes to change the current global hegemony—which is dominated by the U.S., U.K., and other Western nations—into Dar al-Islam, meaning that they wish to transform it into an Islamic land and force people to convert to Islam.

The ultimate objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, as espoused by the group since the days of its founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s, is to adopt a political position of jihad against non-Muslims. The group has a vast international propaganda network and has spawned numerous militant leaders around the world, such as Abdullah Yusuf Azzam, a staunch follower of Al-Banna, who, in 1984, ignited the major Islamist foreign fighter flow to fight the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. By the time Azzam was killed in 1989, he had mentored Osama bin Laden, the founder of Al-Qaeda. Indeed, Bin Laden later said Brotherhood ideas were key to the formation of his ideology.

The Brotherhood’s designation as a “non-violent” group relies on a literalist interpretation of its behavior, and requires ignoring its connections to militancy. In India, for example, the Brotherhood’s local versions have exacerbated inter-communal discord and created chaos on the streets with protests against the Indian government. These Brotherhood and Brotherhood-derived groups on the Subcontinent insist that the foundations of the Indian Constitution—which include the pillars of secularism, democracy, and nationalism—are anti-Islamic, and work to undermine these foundations in India, primarily by trying to provoke a religious civil war between Indian Muslims and Hindus. The Brotherhood’s vision for toppling the Indian government, creating Dar al-Islam in India, and cultivating revolt in Kashmir is also not exactly “non-violent”.

Two prominent Brotherhood offshoot groups in India are the Popular Front of India (PFI) (PFI) and the National Women’s Front (NWF). The PFI was recently banned in India, which has led to something of a resurgence of an older terrorist-designated group, the Students’ Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), which works alongside domestic extremists like the Indian Mujahideen (IM), while receiving external funding from the Qatar-Turkey-Pakistan (“QTP”) axis, and having links with the Pakistani-controlled jihadist ecosystem in Afghanistan that includes the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The outside support for Islamist militancy in India is important, but the domestic sources of support are crucial to understand.

The Brotherhood’s desire to create civil strife to destabilize India and bring down the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is being abetted financially by Indian opposition parties, according to sources. There are some who see the Muslim Brotherhood’s recent upsurge in India as primarily resulting from Indian politicians trying to use this dangerous group as a weapon to defeat Modi’s rule. This would not be completely unprecedented: there were Indian politicians who exploited the Naxalite (Communist) terrorist-insurgency as a political weapon against the government of the day, for example, a far worse situation.

There are roughly as many Muslims in India as there are in Pakistan, a nominally Islamic state, and Muslims in India—unlike in Pakistan—have the freedom to take an active role in politics. There are legal mechanisms for parties to collaborate to remove Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The apparent sly support of a number of Indian politicians for the Brotherhood is, therefore, highly irresponsible. The Brotherhood does not just want to replace the current government; it wants to overthrow the entire ruling system, especially the secularism, but also the democracy and nationalism, because the Brotherhood sees these things as destructive to Islam.

A significant motive for the Muslim Brotherhood resuming its activities in India is that as the country becomes a rising power it is drawing closer to the U.S. and could soon pose a major threat to the anti-Western bloc in South and Southeastern Asia, which is backed by China. That is why this alliance, primarily operating through Pakistan, is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in India, hoping to use the 204 million Muslims in India to provoke civil strife against Hindus to hamper India’s rise. The Muslim population in India is the third largest Muslim population in the world, and the concern of Indian politicians and security agencies is that if the Muslim Brotherhood’s roots are strengthened in India, it will become increasingly difficult to govern the country. In a situation of disorder, it would make Indian Muslims more susceptible to being recruited by the Brotherhood and other international terrorist groups.
https://eeradicalization.com/why-the-mu ... -in-india/
Wie in de Islam zijn hersens gebruikt, zal zijn hoofd moeten missen.
Mahalingam
Berichten: 52064
Lid geworden op: za feb 24, 2007 8:39 pm

Re: De Islamisering van India

Bericht door Mahalingam »

Het is een bekende werkwijze: een groep Mohammedanen nemen een stuk land en bouwen er een moskee op.
Dan is de grond en het gebouw voor eeuwig van hun.
Evenwel in India zijn ze niet de baas en moeten ze zich houden aan de regels en wetten van de seculiere staat. En dat wensen ze niet te doen. Dus moet er letterlijk gevochten worden.
Haldwani: Uttarakhand on alert after four dead in clashes over mosque demolition

At least four people have died in violence in a northern Indian state after authorities demolished a mosque, alleging it was constructed illegally.

Violence broke out in Uttarakhand's Haldwani town during what police say was an "anti-encroachment drive".

Authorities said the drive was launched to clear illegal constructions, including the mosque and an adjoining madrassa (religious school).

But Muslims who prayed at the mosque say they have been unfairly targeted.

Hundreds of protesters and police personnel were injured in the clashes which broke out on Thursday evening.

Videos showed protesters setting fire to vehicles and pelting stones and the police firing tear gas at them.

A curfew has been imposed and the state has issued "shoot at sight" orders to bring the situation under control.

The incident took place in Banbhoolpura area of Haldwani. The district had witnessed widespread protests in January last year after more than 50,000 people, mostly Muslims, were served eviction notice alleging they were illegally living on land owned by the Indian Railways. The demolitions were later stayed by India's top court.

Officials said the latest action was based on a high court order asking authorities to clear illegal settlements from the area.

District Magistrate Vandana Singh said the mosque and the madrassa were demolished because they were illegally built on government land and were not registered as religious structures.

"The drive was not targeted towards any particular community. It began peacefully but a mob attacked officials soon after, leading to violence," Ms Singh said, adding that authorities had given the mosque's administration prior notice about its demolition.

Locals have denied this and said the mosque was demolished before the court could give a final decision in the case.

"When the administration came [to demolish the structures] we asked them to stop until the next court hearing. But they did not listen. If they had waited for the final decision of the court, there would have been no resistance [from us]," Shakeel Ahmad, a local councillor, told the Indian Express newspaper.

Tensions over demolitions of mosques have risen in the past few months.

Muslim groups say they feel unfairly targeted under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Hindu nationalist government and accuse it of religious polarisation ahead of the general elections due in two months. The government denies the allegation.

On Friday, the situation remained tense in Haldwani as authorities snapped internet services and ordered a complete shutdown.

Schools in Banbhoolpura will remain shut for the next few days and thousands of police personnel have been deployed to monitor the situation.

The violence comes days after Uttarakhand passed the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), a new common law for all residents, regardless of religion, sex, gender, and sexual orientation.

Different religious groups in India have their own personal laws which govern issues like marriage, divorce and inheritance.

Muslims in Uttarakhand have rejected the UCC, calling it an interference with their Islamic practices.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-68248362
Wie in de Islam zijn hersens gebruikt, zal zijn hoofd moeten missen.
Plaats reactie